Tiltfactor works to create games that promote fun and social change in equal measure. The Tilt team employs leading psychological theories and game research to produce powerful gaming experiences, which we hope will further the research upon which our products are based. Below, we’ve shared some of the literature that forms our approach.
Theories and Research:
I. Transformative Potential of Fictional Narratives
1. Characters as Friends:
Horton, D., & Wohl, R. R. (1956). Mass communication and para-social interaction: Observations on intimacy at a distance. Psychiatry, 19(3), 215-229.
–Classic work that established the phenomenon of “parasocial interaction” – the illusion of intimacy experienced toward fictional characters, celebrities, and media figures
2. Characters as Role Models:
Hoffner, C. (1996). Children’s wishful identification and parasocial interaction with favorite television characters. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 40, 389-402.
–Examined the relationship between children’s favorite characters and the personality traits possessed by the character that the children wished to emulate
3. Characters as Personas to Assume
Kaufman, G.F., & Libby, L.K. (2012). Changing beliefs and behavior through experience-taking. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 103, 1-19.
–Introduced the concept of experience-taking: the psychological process of simulating the subjective experience of a character and adopting the mindset and identity of that character; revealed numerous implications for behavior change (e.g., voting) and attitude change (e.g., reducing stereotypes and prejudice)
Gabriel, S., & Young, A. F. (2011). Becoming a vampire without being bitten: The narrative collective-assimilation hypothesis. Psychological science, 22, 990-994.
–Showed that readers form an implicit (i.e., unconscious) link between themselves and the group to which a liked character belongs (e.g., vampires in Twilight)
B. Persuasive Impact of Fictional Narratives
Dal Cin, S., Zanna, M. & Fong, G. (2004). Narrative persuasion and overcoming resistance. In E. Knowles & J. Linn (Eds.), Resistance and Persuasion. (pp 175-191). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
–Comprehensive review of empirical studies that investigated the factors affecting the persuasive impact of narratives
Green, M. C., & Brock, T. C. (2000). The role of transportation in the persuasiveness of public narratives. Journal of personality and social psychology, 79, 701-721.
–Explored the impact of transportation (i.e., psychological absorption) in a narrative world on readers’ adoption of beliefs expressed by characters
II. The Impact of Embodied Cognition on Perceptions, Judgments, and Behaviors
Embodied cognition is a topic of research in psychology and philosophy that argues that perceptual and visceral experiences can constrain and direct cognition and judgment (and vice versa), often outside of conscious awareness. Such effects can be attributed to the fact that there is a common “mental storage system” for physical or sensory experiences and the metaphors or abstract concepts related to them.
Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors we live by (Vol. 111). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
–Foundational work establishing the role of metaphor in shaping psychological and visceral experience
Semin, G. R., & Smith, E. R. (2002). Interfaces of social psychology with situated and embodied cognition. Cognitive Systems Research, 3(3), 385-396.
–Lays out the intersection between embodied cognition and psychological change
Carney, D. R., Cuddy, A. J., & Yap, A. J. (2010). Power posing brief nonverbal displays affect neuroendocrine levels and risk tolerance. Psychological Science, 21(10), 1363-1368.
–Showed that holding “power poses” (i.e., expansive, open postures) for just one minute increased testosterone levels, lowered cortisol levels, and increased feelings of power
III. Interventions to Reduce Stereotypes and Prejudice
Hill, C., Corbett, C. & St. Rose, A. (2010). Why So Few? Women in Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics. Washington, DC: AAUW.
–Thorough review of the psychological literature covering two key psychological barriers to women’s participation in STEM domains – stereotype threat and implicit bias – and interventions shown to reduce them
Devine, P. G. (1989). Stereotypes and prejudice: Their automatic and controlled components. Journal of personality and social psychology, 56, 5-18.
–Foundational work arguing that to break the “mental habit” of bias requires: (1) awareness of bias and the contexts in which it occurs, (2) concern about the effects of bias, and (3) application of interventions (see examples below) to “unlearn” stereotypical associations
A. Intervention: Perspective-taking
Galinsky, A. D., & Moskowitz, B. (2000). Perspective-taking: Decreasing stereotype expression, stereotype accessibility, and in-group favoritism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78, 708-724.
–Revealed that imagining a “day in the life” of a member of another group (e.g., the elderly) promoted positive views toward that group
B. Intervention: Exposure to Counter-stereotypical Exemplars
Blair, I. V., Ma, J. E., & Lenton, A. P. (2001). Imagining stereotypes away: The moderation of implicit stereotypes through mental imagery. Journal of personality and social psychology, 81, 828-841.
–Showed that imagining members of groups who defy stereotypes (e.g., “strong women”) effectively reduced unconscious biases toward those groups
C. Intervention: Increasing Individuals’ Social Identity Complexity
Roccas, S., & Brewer, M. B. (2002). Social identity complexity. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 6, 88-106.
–Established the construct of social identity complexity – the level of diversity and inclusiveness in individuals’ representation of their social groups – and argued for its link to tolerance
D. Intervention: Encouraging a “Universal Orientation”
Phillips, S. T., & Ziller, R. C. (1997). Toward a theory and measure of the nature of nonprejudice. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72, 420-434.
–Introduced the concept of “universal orientation” – an indication of non-prejudice whereby individuals reject social categories as a basis for interpersonal assumptions
No Comments »
No comments yet.